Understand Cell Safety in Unprecedented Detail
Fully understand the thermal runaway behaviour of your battery cells, using our proprietary DATRC method.
Fully Quantify the Thermal Runaway Behaviour of a Single Cell
Our proprietary test method quantifies the thermal runaway event of a cell. Each experiment determines the relevant properties that characterise the cell behaviour.
-
Total energy released in the thermal runaway event
Energy fraction remaining in the cell
Energy fraction released with the ejected gas and solid particles
-
Total amount of gas produced by the thermal runaway reaction
Vent gas temperature
Amount of solids ejeted from the cell and size distribution
-
Vent gas release rate during the thermal event, both average and peak rate
Solids release rate, both average and peak rate
Thermal power of the energy release
Similar Cells, Different Safety Behaviour: Interactive Data
Data for 2170 cells from three manufacturers.
4.9 Ah each, similar performance.
Triggered by overheating at 10 °C/min.
Average values for three repeats per type.
Use Cases For Your Role
For Cell
Engineers
Compare cell safety using quantitative data
Understand the safety impacts of chemistry and mechanical design changes
Identify critical aspects of the selected cell early on
For Pack
Engineers
Select the optimal cell early on
Determine the worst-case failure mode of the cell
Size thermal management, propagation protection, and venting provision
For QA
Engineers
Monitor production quality and product safety
Understand batch-to-batch variation when receiving cells
Validate conformance with cells that were used for certification
Understand Safety-Critical Edge Cases
Lithium
Plating
By comparing the DATRC results of pristine and lithium-plated cells, the effects on safety can be understood early in development.
Cell Ageing
& SOH
By comparing the energy and gas released of pristine and aged cells, expensive safety testing on module/pack level can be avoided.
Vent Gas
Combustion
By executing DATRC tests in both air and inert gas, the effect of vent gas combustion with atmospheric oxygen can be determined empirically.
Experimental Details
Limits
Cells up to 250 Ah
All chemistries, including NMC, LFP, Na-ion, etc.
All formats (cylindrical, single-layer and multi-layer pouch, prismatic)
Triggers
Nail penetration
Overheating: Local hotspot or full-cell
Electrical abuse: Short circuit, overcharging, forced discharge, etc.
Test Environment
Air
Inert atmosphere (argon, nitrogen)
Temperature preconditioning
Can’t find what you are looking for? Contact us to discuss your individual test!
Complexity Based on Your Requirements
| Baseline Screening | Dynamics Deep-Dive | Precise Modeling | ||
| TR Onset Temperature | °C | Included | Included | Included |
| Cell Surface Temperature | °C | Included | Included | Included |
| Vent Gas Temperature | °C | Included | Included | Included |
| TR Calorimetry: Cell Energy Fraction | J | Included | Included | Included |
| TR Calorimetry: Ejecta Energy Fraction | J | Included | Included | Included |
| TR Reaction Profile | W | — | Included | Included |
| Total Vent Gas Volume | L or mol | — | Included | Included |
| Vent Gas Release Rate | L/s | — | Included | Included |
| Ejecta Heat Capacity | J/kg·K | — | — | Included |
| Ejecta Particle Size Analysis | - | — | — | Included |
Download Our Example Dataset
Want to find out more? Download an example dataset for a 21700 cell by filling-in the form below.